SMART URBAN
SENSING
Retail · Conversion optimisation

Radiator Outlet

Connecting showroom visits with sales performance.

Leeds showroom · Retail conversion and efficiency. Evaluation dates and exact measurement scope are not specified in the case material.

Discuss a similar project ↗
Legacy supplier-reported figuresEvidence & sources ↓
Radiator Outlet logo surrounded by radiator and interior photographs
Customer image retained from the SUS story library. Specific site and photo date are not established.

Project at a glance

Radiator Outlet

Customer

Retail · Conversion optimisation

Single site

Deployment scope

See the installation account below

Showroom conversion reporting

Measurement focus

Scope or reporting capability, not a verified uplift

SUS

Delivery partner

Legacy supplier-reported figures

01

The initial problem

A sale records the visitors who bought, but not those who left without buying. The Radiator Outlet story focuses on connecting showroom traffic with conversion and efficiency.

Account supplied by SUS for this story.
02

What SUS installed

The case material identifies AI 3D counting and V9 analytics. Together, these are presented as the measurement and reporting approach used in the showroom.

Account supplied by SUS for this story.
03

How the reporting was used

The reported improvements are commercial outcomes, not proof that installing a counter alone caused them. The available account does not describe the specific staffing or sales-process changes made during the evaluation.

Account supplied by SUS for this story.
04

The operational change

The supplied case material describes conversion and efficiency reporting for the Leeds showroom. It does not identify the specific operational intervention or include the underlying before-and-after data. The earlier percentages are retained separately as legacy supplier-reported figures, not newly validated outcomes.

Account supplied by SUS for this story.

What the evidence supports

Legacy supplier-reported figures only. The baseline, evaluation period, efficiency definition and underlying records have not been supplied.

Legacy supplier-reported figures · not newly validated

Existing SUS case material reports 15% conversion uplift and a 20% efficiency gain. Baselines, evaluation dates, calculation methods and the efficiency KPI definition were not supplied. The conversion figure must not be interpreted as a 15 percentage-point change. Neither figure meets the new measurement-record standard on the evidence currently available.

Account supplied by SUS for this story.
Sources, approvals and measurement standard

Evidence detail

Existing SUS case material supplied for this project. No underlying measurement record is available.

  • SUS-supplied customer account and deployment confirmation. No public measurement record is linked.

Standard for newly validated outcomes

A future result will be labelled “Measurement record available” only when its KPI definition, baseline, comparison period, site scope, counting exclusions, calculation and source records have been reviewed and publication approved. This is the acceptance standard, not a claim that every existing figure has passed it.

Legacy figures and qualitative accounts

Previously published supplier figures remain labelled as such, with missing measurement details stated. Installation facts, reporting capabilities and qualitative operational changes are not commercial uplift. None of the figures here is presented as independently verified.

Your site. Your decision.

Find where traffic is failing to convert.

Tell SUS what you need to understand, where you need coverage and which decision better data should inform. Send it through the SUS enquiry form and mention this customer story.

Book a free 20-minute footfall review ↗Calculate likely ROI →